G is for Gravity? Ruminations on the “Generative Principle” in Evolution…

Virtually anyone who has spent any time at all looking into the secret societies behind the panorama of conspiratorial activity within this country and around the world, has undoubtedly become familiar with Freemasonry, and in turn, with the infamous “G” so often incorporated into the square and compass logo.
Cursory explanations delve into the notion of the Freemasonic “god”, or “Grand Architect”, (who they ultimately point to as being Lucifer, of course), while the G is also said to represent the so-called “Generative Principle”, as explained here:

“It conceives of the divine nature as residing in man, and that it is especially active and expressive in the sexual passion; and that the gratification of this passion is pleasing to the deity and is the duty of the Mason. It aims to make passion, therefore, sacred by making its gratification a moral and religious duty. On its theological side, Freemasonry is a sort of Pantheism, the deity being the generative principle, the reproductive power which pervades all animated nature. And as this power inheres in man, it is viewed as “incarnate in humanity in toto,” thus establishing man’s union and unity with the divine nature.” (excerpt from this exposition on the meanings of Masonry)

Now, so far all this is fairly old news. But what has been really persistent in my inquiries towards the possibility of true enclosed, Flat Earth, (and the subsequent realization that heliocentricism is itself a component of the broader Evolutionary lie) is that the more I think about it all, the more it very much seems to me that perhaps this whole “NASA paradigm”, if we can call it that, in many ways has served to essentially indoctrinate the masses not just with lies, but lies that are actually materialistic, “scientistic” versions of ancient Occultic, Luciferian doctrines.

sts121-masonicAnd the subject of Freemasonry is itself a perfect example of helping us comprehend this, because we can look at the layers/levels/”degrees” of Masonry itself, and recognize how the lower, entry-level degrees are indeed quite oblivious to the hardened Satanic belief system propelling the entire thing. At the lower levels, they sincerely do just believe they are part of some kind of altruistic charitable Fraternity, and yet at the same time in those stages they are being presented with shallow, “hollowed out” explanations of the symbolism and rituals, which if they continue to “progress” in the Brotherhood they will become privy to the “deeper” meanings, etc.

Now, if we can fairly easily recognize Darwinian Evolution to be a repackaged Luciferian doctrine, masked in the guise of humanistic science, then when pondering the false cosmology of Copernicanism, I now have to say that the “theory of Gravity” does also seem to actually be another one of these ancient mystical concepts that has been repackaged and re-introduced to the masses as “scientific fact”.

Universe_expansion2After all, “Gravity” is not merely taught to be the pulling force produced by humongous collections of mass, such as stars/planets/moons etc., but it is also the very force which is alleged to have pulled all these celestial bodies together in the first place! According to the Big Bang, from the original “Singularity” sprang forth all the physical matter that is now still constantly being flung outward in every direction in an ever-expanding universe. But, that matter from the singularity then had to begin forming all the “elementary particles”, as described in such insanely convoluted manners as the following:

“In the most common models the universe was filled homogeneously and isotropically with a very high energy density and huge temperatures and pressures and was very rapidly expanding and cooling. Approximately 10−37 seconds into the expansion, a phase transition caused a cosmic inflation, during which the universe grew exponentially. After inflation stopped, the universe consisted of a quark–gluon plasma, as well as all other elementary particles. Temperatures were so high that the random motions of particles were at relativistic speeds, and particle–antiparticle pairs of all kinds were being continuously created and destroyed in collisions. At some point an unknown reaction called baryogenesis violated the conservation of baryon number, leading to a very small excess of quarks and leptons over antiquarks and antileptons—of the order of one part in 30 million. This resulted in the predominance of matter over antimatter in the present universe.”

hqdefaultOf course, this is pure nonsense, but throw in enough impressive-sounding words, and you can make it appear quite scientific indeed. First the “elementary particles” somehow are formed in all the heat, from an explosion which occurs for who-knows-what reason. Then those particles somehow form into atoms, then the atoms into the various periodic elements, and then the elements into molecules, and so on, and so forth…

1979-moon-masonic-medallion nasa-mason-signsEvolution is without question a mystical belief system at it’s core (which I have written about before), and so now in the context of Flat Earth research and the knowledge that NASA is basically a Freemasonic institution, it’s interesting, don’t you think, to ponder that ol’ “G” in the middle of the square/compass, in light of how Evolution and “Gravity” are more or less watered-down, “materialized” versions of what are really mystical, occult precepts.

This whole idea is one that I am actually exploring on a number of fronts here, as I do also suspect that the entire subject of the “planets” is again, another example of this same thing, but that will probably have to wait until another post. I do think I’m barely scratching the surface here, if indeed there is anything to these kinds of observations at all, and so I think it will be interesting to see what all might come out of it over time. If we have that much time left for such secondary speculations, I suppose…


19 thoughts on “G is for Gravity? Ruminations on the “Generative Principle” in Evolution…”

  1. Wow, wow, wow! I think I’m in love! Your site is a precious gem hidden in a web of Matrix on the internet! Thanks so much for your kind message. I will post your site on my Zetetic Facebook right now! I’m just speechless how good you are and how much you know. Amazing!

    1. You are too kind friend, but I greatly appreciate the encouragement! I’m still fairly new to the whole Flat Earth idea, but it’s been absolutely amazing to see even in a short time how much it really ties so many different pieces together. I’m trying to start getting more active on YT as well, making videos, etc, but I’m newer to that as well, mostly just been writing about NWO-ish things for the past few years. Thanks again, and I look forward to looking at more of your material in the future.

    1. Yes, I am right there with you. Been trying to learn more about the whole “electric universe” idea and everything, but I admit it’s something I haven’t managed to give much time to as of yet. Obviously, “gravity” is a “thing”, in terms of there is of course a force pulling us all downwards, but that in itself is a far cry from the notion that large collections of matter intrinsically create their own gravitational pull towards themselves. The whole Tesla/Enstein thing is a fascinating one to me too, because clearly Tesla was WAY ahead of his time (and some people believe he got a lot of his breakthroughs from his own Occult sources, but who knows…) but obviously, so many of the things he worked on are now in use today, and yet when he was still alive, he basically laughed at the theory of Relativity, and virtually all of Einsteinian physics for that matter. Seems like Einstein was a brilliant guy, who was brought in for the purpose of “making the math work” for a Cosmology that had already been predetermined…

      1. I have the Electric Universe book and although I haven’t read it yet, I have listened to a few podcasts on the subject and watched the movie Thunderbolts of the Gods. Tesla was rumoured to have had contact with beings who claimed they were Venus; whether he did or not, the man was certainly connected to something. A true visionary.

        1. ahh… Yeah, well, if he was communicating with beings claiming to be from Venus, I would say that would actually make a lot of sense, from a Biblical point of view.

          Now that I think about it, I’m wondering if I vaguely remember seeing something on Ancient Aliens, or some similar show, talking about how he was receiving communications from entities through radio static or something. Not sure if I’m remembering that correctly or not…

          1. I’ve heard of the ‘spirit phone’, I saw an article somewhere online that gives you instructions to build one. From what I remember it seemed fairly simple to construct.

            1. Yeah, I’m sure it’s not hard to construct, though I would adamantly advise against it! Ultimately, a “spirit phone” is no different than any other device used for the purpose of spirit divination, which have been used throughout all of history. Heck, a Ouji board is a type of “spirit telegraph”, in that it conveys letters rather than actual audio. There are many ways to contact the spirit entities, but whatever method used, in the end you’re still dialing the same lying, demonic number… 😉

              1. Each to their own, although Ouija can be dangerous when the precautions aren’t taken. Unlike a spirit phone, Ouija uses your body as the communication device; whereas with a spirit phone there’s no human channel needed for it to work.

                1. “precautions”… What kind of “precautions” exactly, would ultimately be of any help, if in fact the entities being contacted through a medium such as Ouji are not some wide spectrum of “spirits”, but simply ALL demonic…(?)

                  If they’re actually demons, then you’re only fooling yourself with “precautions”…

                  And even though a “spirit phone” doesn’t use the person’s own hands/fingers, it still involves the intent of the person, an intent to receive communication “from the other side”. It is this inner intent, that conscious decision, which I believe is what ultimately “opens the doorways”, allowing the entities to have access to oneself.

                  1. You’re right, consent is a factor. If you see anything that is non-physical as ‘demonic’ I cannot persuade you otherwise and I have no intention of doing so; so any precautions I have to offer will be rejected. As for ‘demonic’ entities, the original meaning of demon was never anything evil, just a generalisation for any non-physical force. Religious establishments turned the tables and changed the general concensus of the meaning of the word from something neither good nor evil, to something evil.

                    1. No, I most certainly do not regard anything non-physical (or meta-physical), to be demonic. The universe, I believe, holds a rather astounding array of creatures, existing in a number of dimensional capacities. The question, however, is which ones you are indeed contacting, when “venturing out into the unknown”…

                      Not everything can be written off as the distortions of “religious establishments” either, because men like Moses, Abraham, Noah and Enoch, were all living and understanding that only God, and God alone, is who we should be reaching out to commune with, prior to any “religious establishment”. The Holy Angels of Heaven do not answer to divination, only the Fallen ones do…

                    2. For myself personally, I don’t depend or call on entities although I have had my encounters with a few different types. I do however rely on my divine connection to whatever you want to call it. I agree with that reaching out to something you never know what it is you’re reaching out to. Light can reveal things but also conceal the darkness, therefore any ‘light beings’ I encounter I never assume they’re good simply because they ‘look nice’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s