Am I still allowed to say, “Florida”…?

Let’s conduct a little experiment here, since I haven’t used the ol’ blog in quite some time indeed. But this seems like a fitting reason. The fact of the matter is, that because of the very nature of this very topic, trying to make a video about would most likely be futile anyhow, since A) using any msm clips would be instantly jumped on for copyright violation, and B) it seems that virtually any video or webpage for that matter that dares to mention the name David, uh, let’s say “rhymes with dogg”, is now apparently in danger of getting instantly flagged, removed, (reported to the authorities for possible psychological health examination?)

Forget jumping the shark… The shark is now daring to jump over the Fonz.

Cooper is straight up takin it to the “right wing conspiracy crazies”. The “ignor and marginalize” strategy seems to have given way to the “let’s acknowledge the allegations and confront them directly” approach. But this whole thing is SOOO pushing the limits of plausibility, on so many fronts, that I’ve literally been hearing about people with family members, who for YEARS have rolled their eyes every time 9/11 inside job came up, etc., now…… they aren’t scoffing.

It’s almost like they are intentionally making it SO blatant, and so bumbled, that they are DARING every truther with any voice, to stick their hand in the proverbial hole in the wall. I went to David H-rhymes-with-dogg’s YT channel only a day ago, and almost every video had only a couple hundred views. Now? After being interviewed by countless reporters, and talking to Anderson Cooper (in the most deadpan, non-traumatized manner imaginable) he’s not surprisingly getting thousands:

And there is just so much weirdness, and plasticity to it all, that it just boggles the mind…

Even in the handful of videos he had up, as part of his “vlog”, before the incident, it smells! Yet, this is just all being doubled down on, tripled down on. Kids are getting on buses directly from the funerals, and going to the Florida courthouse, to lend their voice to the coincidentally unfolding hearings on gun control.

But that’s all crazy conspiracy theory. Just like if H-rhymes-with-dogg had some kind of affiliation with Jon Podesta’s “charity”, or had actually graduated High School in California, in 2015…

So, okay…. Let’s see how long it takes for this post to get removed and labeled as “hate speech”.

The fact that this whole Florida incident happened right around the same time as the insanely laughable “Tesla Roadster in Space” stunt only makes it all seem that much more like the lines are being intentionally drawn, daring folks to either cling to their cognitive dissonance with every fiber of their being, or risk actually being hunted down via social media, as some kind of criminal, simply because you can see what should be painfully obvious to anyone, who isn’t completely brainwashed.

I used to be able to laugh at the deplorable levels of group-think and State worship, in places like North Korea. I can’t anymore…

8 thoughts on “Am I still allowed to say, “Florida”…?”

  1. Wow, you are right. This is so insane.
    It is “in your face” mockery. I too think they are trying to get those who can see the truth to “raise our hands” so they can decide how to contain all the crazies, and be counted as such.

  2. You nailed it. This is what I have been trying to show people. These events are loaded. They make sure we get the crisis actor, the multiple shooter, and the inside job narratives out for each. This is our Hegelian Dialectic. They will make 1 side feel like they are more educated and understand science and history better than their mouth breathing counterparts. To save the country, these people must be neutralized. Then the other side is fed “inside news” and evidence of corruption/ subversion. They are fed the narrative that the left is being manipulated by the revolutionaries, and therefore must be neutralized to save the country. People are smart. Groups can be turned into a mob with very little encouragement. Social media and news article comment threads are the rally points for these new age of flash mobs. It silences one side and emboldens the other. It removes reason and truth from the debate and presents a distorted picture that grossly exaggerates the size of the opposition. I also do not think those kids had a clue this was coming. I think they were positioned. Could be, even the kid’s dad had no idea. You saw Bill Copper wrote about this in Behold a Pale Horse?

  3. I’m right with you Will. Craziness!

    On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 8:53 PM, We see as through a glass darkly wrote:

    > Daring to look… posted: “Let’s conduct a little experiment here, since I > haven’t used the ol’ blog in quite some time indeed. But this seems like a > fitting reason. The fact of the matter is, that because of the very nature > of this very topic, trying to make a video about would ” >

  4. Hi there,

    I have been following you on YT as well as on your website – grand work – well researched and presented – thank you for the efforts and insight.

    My wife and I gave our lives to The Most High God in the Name of Yeshua in 2005 – however discovering the Flat Earth brought a sense of clarity, almost like a weight had been lifted, so much more sense and simplicity in our Creator’s design .

    Which brings me to a concern that I must share with you and I hope that you can perhaps shed some clarity on this issue. Having listened to Skiba’s material – in depth as well – I found myself conducting my own research – the book of Enoch and the book of Jasher – that was enough –

    I found it very necessary to question the authenticity of these Apocryphal documents, or more specifically, the integrity of the authors. Needless to say that the angel Phanuel mentioned in the book of Enoch is referred to as the angel of penance (and salvation?) yet there is no mention of him in Scripture – it’s Yeshua alone who is our redeemer and Saviour.
    This aside there appears to be strong links between the Mormon church and the book of Enoch and the ‘prophet’ Joseph Smith..(he’s the guy that translated the book of Moses?)
    Essentially there are too many sketchy issues pertaining to the book of Enoch to give it any credence in relation to the Word of our One True God.
    Having said this brings another conundrum to the surface – The teaching that Angels (Sons of God) came down to earth and mated with the daughters of men……errr…… it is mankind / believers and keepers of Yahweh’s laws that become sons of God.

    I looked up the meaning of bene ha Elohim – and the translation from the Kabbalah is sons of the gods – slightly different. All other references in Scripture (bar Job) to sons of God is directed at man who embraces the Spiritual life and faith in the One True God through Yeshua.

    My apologies if this appears to be a long mumbled up ramble – it has been some time since I have corresponded however I felt the need to transfer some of the thoughts down before I procrastinated too much and did not share my misgivings of the teachings that are being put out there.

    I don’t accept the Angels impregnating the daughters of men resulting in giants – Scripture clearly depicts that the giants were already there. I have been looking into the Nephilim saga for the last five years through Chuck Missler and the gang (LA, the unhinged Steve Quayle et al.) I long ago realised that book sales and worldly credibility are way higher up on their agenda than truth, I thought Rob Skiba was the real thing as well until I started taking a closer gander at the Books of Enoch and Jasher – nope it’s the Scripture alone for me I would really appreciate some feedback and your perspective here as well.

    If you have the time and you can make sense of my ramblings above.

    God bless and thanks again for the hard work



    1. Hi Ruairi, thanks for the question.. First, I’d say that I essentially would treat the Genesis 6 issue and the questions on Enoch as two separate things, (although of course they’re super related, due to the Nephilim issue) But in terms of Genesis 6, I personally have been forced to conclude, that even if we totally set aside the Book of Enoch, the few short verses there in Genesis do not make any logical sense when we attempt to interpret the “sons of God” as humans, especially if we mean Men of Faith. Why would giants result from, or even be mentioned in any connection with, the act of “righteous men” taking wives of the daughters of men? The context of those passages are in the greater theme of the extreme wickedness prevalent before the Flood. If the “daughters of men” were not Faithful to God, then how can it be argued that the men who were marrying them were “Faithful”, and therefore becoming sons of God? And indeed, how do we just dismiss the reference in Job, which you did mention, which definitely uses “sons of God” to refer to angels, not humans..?

      What does Genesis 6 say? verese 4: 4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown. Right there it is directly saying that the Nephilim were the PRODUCT of those sexual unions. So how do wicked giants result from the conventional sexual union of ANY humans, whether “righteous” or unrighteous?

      I first pose these questions, looking only at the canonized scripture, before even bothering to dig into all the nuanced issues/questions of the non-canonical books…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s