Tag Archives: illuminati bloodlines

“Temple of Oculus Anubis” in Oregon…?

So the other day I came across a few blogs that were writing about a property in Damascus, OR with some very interesting features indeed. They all seemed to be more or less pulling from an original article published last fall in That Oregon Life called “Temple Oculus Anubis, One of the Creepiest Places in Oregon”. The story cites other online investigations/discussions on the property to be found on reddit and elsewhere, including some very frightened testimony of a young woman living in the area who had visited the entryway seen in the pictures several times, and reported seeing unmarked white vans and being followed and harassed.

Is this just typical “urban legend conspiracy theory” type stuff? Or is there possibly really something rather sinister going on in this place?

If you’re the kind of nerd like me who can find themselves reading through all the various threads and checking the place out on google maps etc., then I’d say there really is evidence to support that this very well might be something more going on here than just a “rich dude who likes weird Egyptian stuff”. There is indeed a business listing online for “Oculus Inc.”, (supposedly some kind of vague medical supplies company) which lists as it’s website heavensgate.com, which is amazingly enough the website associated the “Heaven’s Gate” cult famous for the “Haley Bop comet spaceship” suicides in 1997.

1377112355001sFor me, one of the most significant elements of this bizarre looking entryway is the “crest” on top of the gate. If it was just a matter of there being some pyramid-shaped stone markers and an Egyptian statue in the woods, then I might not be so inclined to find it so suspect. That crest alludes to much more than just “rich guy who likes Egyptian stuff”. It bears a rather obvious similarity to the Royal British crest, and other emblems of monarchies, and to me it just reeks of “ancient occult bloodline” connections. I mean, lions, a dragon, and a crown? Come on now…

Digging through the various threads, you read about claims of underground tunnels being built, about how the property is sold regularly to shadowy personages, etc., and again, it does become difficult to separate fact from speculative fiction. But at the same time, one thing that REALLY struck me almost instantly, especially as I was looking at the aerial view on google maps, was the realization that this ornate occult-themed entryway couldn’t possibly be the only entrance. This is a million dollar home we’re talking about after all. There is most certainly a multi-car garage back there somewhere, which would necessitate a driveway, presumably with a formidable gate, presumably on the other side of the property, possibly connecting to Clackamas highway which runs along the backside of the expansive wooded land surrounding the home/”business”…(?)

Of course, it really could just be some eccentric person/family with a taste for landscaping that is almost cliché in it’s Illuminati connotations…

oculus-damascus-or-1But especially whenever the calendar starts coming around to one the various occult holidays such as the one approaching tomorrow, and we know that on these “high days” of the Druidian and occult calendars ritual sacrifices ARE performed all over the world, while the majority of us go along with our merry little lives without noticing anything unusual, these sorts of head-scratchers really give me pause. Actually, they give me real chills. Because the reality is that there ARE properties and buildings, all over the place, which we probably drive by and see from the outside all the time, and never imagine the kinds of ritualistic horrors that take place inside them while we’re doing the laundry, or falling asleep to reruns of Seinfeld. They do “hide in plain sight”, relying more than anything else on the fact that most people simply can’t imagine that such organized evil really does exist, or that people really DO worship ancient “gods” in the modern technological world we live in today.

Advertisements

Christian Zionism through the lens of a black-stone…

blackstonehexagramcrossI have been exploring quite the fascinating little rabbit trail as of late. It began as I was looking through material for my recent post on Scofield and his Rothschild connections/funding, which enabled his “Scofield Bible” to take the Zionist interpretations of the Bible in the form of the doctrine of “Dispensationalism” and disseminate it throughout American Christianity over the course of the 20th century. In the course of this research, three other names kept coming up in connection with Scofield. These would be John Nelson Darby (considered to be the “father of Dispensationalism), Dwight L. Moody (founder of Moody Bible Institute), and a Mr. William E. Blackstone, who was hailed by Superior Court Justice Louis Brandeis as the “father of Christian Zionism). (remember that name Brandeis, we will get back to him in a bit). Together, these four individuals could very well be said to at the very nexus of the inception of Zionism into Christianity during the late 1800’s and into the century that followed.

Image148Much like Scofield, Blackstone himself has no Biblical background but is “self-taught”, and actually comes from a background which is typically described vaguely as “success in business”. Further investigation reveals that he was in the railroad business in Chicago, as his cousin was no one less than Timothy Beach Blackstone, president of the Chicago and Alton Railroad from 1864 through 1899.  William sets aside his endeavors in the railroad business to author a booklet titled “Jesus Is Coming“. Public interest in the prophetic themes of this work eventually led to the creation of prophecy conferences in the late 1800’s often called the “Niagara Conferences“, where the prophetic themes of Dispensationalism, millennialism, and pre-Tribulationalism were all being heavily emphasized and presented in cohesion with one another and notable figures such as Scofield and many others attended. (This I find particularly interesting, since for some time now I have been suspecting that all of these prophetic doctrines have been quite interwoven since their inception, and the Niagara Conferences definitely seem to support this).

Cave in Jerusalem where Blackstone wrote his name
Cave in Jerusalem where Blackstone wrote his name

In 1888, Blackstone embarks on his first “missionary trip” to Palestine and essentially becomes one of the first notable Christian figures to espouse this idea of the persecuted Ashkenazi Jews in places like Russia and Eastern Europe and call for the re-creation of a Jewish Homeland.

Now, this is where it starts to get VERY interesting from a “NWO point of view”…

From “The Gospel According to Rothschild“:

On March 5, 1891, the Chicago businessman and Methodist Episcopal lay worker William E. Blackstone was introduced by Secretary of State James G. Blaine to President Benjamin Harrison in order to present a petition Blackstone authored, ‘Palestine for the Jews.’ ‘What shall be done for the Russian Jews?’ the petition asked, and Blackstone boldly answered:

“Why not give Palestine back to them again? According to God’s distribution of nations, it is their home, an inalienable possession, from which they were expelled by force….Why shall not the powers which under the treaty of Berlin, in 1878, gave Bulgaria to the Bulgarians and Servia to the Servians now give Palestine back to the Jews?…Let us now restore them to the land of which they were so cruelly despoiled by our Roman ancestors.

Nonetheless, Benjamin Harrison did not accept Blackstone’s proposal… Blackstone would send the Memorial to presidents Cleveland and Roosevelt (McKinley had already signed), but official government sympathy for the Zionist project would have to wait for Woodrow Wilson.”

The Blackstone Memorial emerged from the same Reformation and Enlightenment preoccupations with Jews as the original nation whose restoration confirms other ‘natural,’ European nations and comprises both a necessary prerequisite and model for the reconstitution of an authentic, ‘primitive’ Christianity. Blackstone’s contribution to this tradition was to elaborate a fully realized political Zionism that took long-standing religious narratives into the realm of late-nineteenth-century nationalism, colonialism, and imperialism. Indeed, with Blackstone’s petition and related activities antedating by six years the convening of Theodor Herzl’s first Zionist conference in 1897, Nathan Straus and Louis Brandeis thought enough of his practical efforts to flatter the evangelist as ‘the father of Zionism.’

Timothy Beach Blackstone (1829-1900), who was president of the Chicago & Alton Railroad from 1864 to 1899, had been a surveyor for the New York and New Haven Railroad under Col. Roswell B. Mason, who brought Blackstone after him to the Illinois Central Railroad in 1851. (Biography of Timothy B. Blackstone. By Ida Hinsman, 1917.) T.B. Blackstone was one of the financial supporters of his cousin, William Eugene Blackstone (1841-), of Blackstone Memorial fame. Marvin Hughitt, President of the Chicago & Northwestern Railroad, Milton Stewart and his brother, Lyman Stewart, of the Union Oil Company of California, were other financial supporters of W.E. Blackstone. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis administered his funding for evangelizing to Jews…

“The signatories of the Blackstone Memorial included such powerful Wall Street figures as Chauncey M. Depew, John D. Rockefeller and his brother William Rockefeller, William E. Dodge, Frank Loomis, Cyrus W. Field, Russell Sage, and John A. Stewart, as well as Rev. Edward W. Gilman, brother of the president of Johns Hopkins University [Daniel Coit Gilman / S&B 1852]. Their Harriman, Vanderbilt, Guaranty Trust, Skull & Bones, and Standard Oil money and connections have created two world wars to drive the Jews out of Europe and into Palestine; and today, the resulting strife is the pretext for America’s invasion of the Middle East. And E.H. Harriman’s sons elevated the Bush family into the U.S. power elite…

So now we see this self-educated Protestant evangelist being lauded and promoted by the Rothschild agent of Louis Brandeis. This is huge. One could spend days going over all the various ways that the Rothschilds had arguably the largest involvement in the creation of the nation/state of Israel than anything else through such events as the Balfour Declaration and others, but for the sake of this discussion I am focusing on the Blackstone connection.

From “The History of the House of Rothschild“:

“On June 4, Ashkenazi Jew, Louis Dembitz Brandeis is appointed to the Supreme Court of the United States by President Wilson as per his agreed blackmail payment to Samuel Untermyer some three years earlier. Justice Brandeis is also the elected leader of the Executive Committee for Zionist Affairs, a position he has held since 1914.”

(Remember, this is the same “Untermeyer” that was so connected to Scofield and the publishing of the “Scofield Reference Bible”…) Brandeis is the political insider who backs Blackstone in his submissions of the “Blackstone Memorial”, (a petition calling for the restoration of Israel that was funded by the likes of the RockefellersImage149 and J.P. Morgan) first to President Harrison, and then to the much more compliant Wilson.

But indeed, the more you start digging around into all the connections between all these “Blackstone Zionists“, the more you keep coming across these same sorts of eyebrow-raising affiliations. Why do Blackstone and Moody and friends have so many connections to all the “usual suspects”? We’re talking New York bankers, Oil and Railroad tycoons, Yale graduates and “Bonesmen”, Rothschild middle-men, etc., etc. Honestly, the deeper I have dug into it all, the more I it just feels like an exercise in reading the same names over and over again, all pointing back to the same conglomerate of a highly powerful and influential people…

If nothing else, I think what must be absolutely shattered in the mindsets of modern evangelicals, is this preposterous assumption that the state of Israel just ‘miraculously’ came into existence in 1948 as though by the hand of God Himself. I know this is a tender matter for many Christians, but a thorough examination of the matter reveals a very different story. These plans and maneuverings for re-establishing a Jewish state FAR proceeded ’48, or the atrocities of the Holocaust, and can quite transparently be traced back to the same “cabal of kabbalists” who succeeding in robbing the United States of it’s own monetary system, and thus it’s very sovereignty. The “Blackstone lens” reveals that Dispensationalism, “Christian Zionism”, and pre-Trib millennialism were all in fact concepts heavily supported for over one hundred years by Satanically-motivated men who have sold their souls for the cause of the anti-Christ kingdom. I don’t know how else to put it. Either the “conspiracy” is staggeringly real, and far bigger than most people are willing to conceive (including all of the Rothschild/Israel/Zionism elements thereof), or it’s all just a bunch of nonsense so let’s go back to playing Candy Crush… 😉

blackstonekabbalah

(Further links:)
http://www.jewishmag.com/146mag/brandeis_blackstone/brandeis_blackstone.htm
http://jerusalemprayerteam.org/pdf/022505.pdf
http://watch.pair.com/revision.html
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm
http://www.rense.com/general88/hist.htm
http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm
http://static1.squarespace.com/static/526009b5e4b0e94ba1d4c2fa/t/52b1be73e4b01c83b9228d5e/1387380339872/WEB+Forgotten+Founder108.pdf
http://www.academia.edu/7243709/Blackstone_William_E._First_Biolan_in_Israel

Who’s the Catcher, Who’s the Fox….

dupontilluminatieyeSometimes my wife absolutely hates watching movies with me. This is not her fault, of course, and I have been making a conscious effort over the last couple of years to curtail my internal reactions to things on the screen which to me seem like a perfectly good rabbit trail on which to go off on some rant about the “deep state” or “black ops” or whatever else. Fellas, your lady doesn’t want to spend date night listening to you talk about the New World Order. Somehow, this does not seem relevant her desire to cultivate intimacy with you.

And so, this is why when watching “Foxcatcher” last night, which largely takes place on the estate of John E. Dupont, I think I managed to only make onelittle comment about the Duponts being a major Illuminati-bloodline family. There was a scene where Steve Carrell (who plays John Dupont) is standing on the property telling his new wrestling recruit about the grounds, how certain battles of the Revolutionary War were fought right across the field, and there is this shot where they are standing there looking across this picturesque New England landscape, standing beside an Egyptian obelisk. A veritable mini-Washington monument, in all it’s American-blue-blood, phallic glory. It was just too perfect of a picture not to point it out… 🙂

The film itself was admittedly quite well made. The acting was unarguably top notch, Carrell putting in a performance which really demonstrated how committed to a role he can be, exuding a subtle creepiness in a character that truly did not feel like it was rehashing anything I’d ever seen before in a villain. The entire film maintains a very eerie, brooding tone, from start to finish, with a character-driven realism that is indeed rare in movie-making these days. Mark Ruffalo gave an equally stellar performance as Dave Schultz, creating a perfect contrast to Carrell’s portrayal of Dupont. You can’t help but start to like the character of big brother Dave from the start. Mentor, father-figure, training partner to Mark, family man with his priorities in order, a down-to-Earth guy who’s ego doesn’t ever get the best of him. The longer the movie goes on, the more you feel yourself dreading the eventual conclusion. Dupont, on the other hand, isn’t terribly likeable from the get-go, and as things progress his character only becomes more pathetic and tragic.

The widow of Dave Schultz has gone on record saying that the movie is incredibly accurate in it’s depiction of the events, and I don’t doubt that in most ways it is, from a certain perspective. Apparently younger brother Mark has expressed strong objections to being portrayed as having had illicit relations with Dupont, as is inferred in the movie with things like a scene of the rich benefactor knocking on his window in the middle of the night, and calling him to the mansion for a one-on-one “wrestling workout” under the watchful eyes of old Dupont family portraits. It’s hard to say exactly what the nature of that relationship was, but it seems reasonable to leave such dynamics as being quite open to possibility. Even if it was true, I can appreciate why the real Mark Schultz wouldn’t relish the idea of having such a thing recreated in cinematic form. They movie actually does a remarkable job of subtly portraying the inner pain and guilt that Mark increasingly carries, even though he never really uses words to tell anyone, even his brother Dave. However true-to-life that aspect of the film was, it was definitely a very emotionally moving arc to travel alongside of, and seeing the way that Dave never stopped loving and supporting his brother through it all, even though you’re never quite sure how much of Dupont’s unhealthy control over Mark he’s able to piece together. Perhaps if he had, he wouldn’t have stayed on at Foxcatcher Farms as a wrestling coach even after Mark had to leave…

On the other hand… Every time I watch anything anymore, I am constantly asking myself “What are the underlying narratives going on here? What lies behind the more obvious story, and connects to something deeper?”

Well, if the testimony of Jay Parker is in fact true, there is indeed a whole lot more to the story.

The film portrays John Dupont as an aging silver-spooned narcissist who turns to the sport of wrestling as a means of trying to free himself from his personal dynastic demons, using his financial sway to create a fictional, self-deluded identity as a “mentor” and “leader of men” to young, physical athletes. That much is almost certainly not made-up, but in the video below, starting at about the 22:30 mark, Jay explains that as a member of an Illuminati family himself, his mother was actually recruited as a mind-control programmer to construct a certain manner of Monarch programming on John Dupont, one of her students, in order to eventually trigger him into committing an act that would land him in a psychiatric hospital, and give them access to the massive family inheritance that was his.


The whole interview is actually pretty interesting, if you want to listen to the whole thing where he talks about everything from eugenics to satanic ritual abuse, then I’d say it’s pretty interesting, and quite relevant, but the part specifically dealing with John Dupont is about ten minutes, from about 22:30 to 32:00.

If this is true, then a film such a Foxcatcher immediately starts to take on a radically different tone. As Jay says in the interview, “those who are raised being exposed to pedophilia and human sacrifice, are quite likely to grow up being pedophiles and human-sacrificers themselves”… Of course, the claims of a person like Parker are not iron-clad proof, and we should not treat it as such, but I do whole-heartedly believe that they should not be laughed-off either.

The more you listen to testimonies such as his, the more you will slowly hear a continuity to the kinds of things he is describing, a cohesion to these kinds of accounts alleging that there are indeed rich, powerful families who practice generational Satanism on a scale that most ordinary citizens could scarcely imagine. When you start to really grasp just how massive in scope it is, and how deeply entrenched families like the Duponts are within the military-industrial complex and “Dynastic American Luciferianism”, then you can start to see how a figure like John E. Dupont could really have been a “scared little fox” himself, running through the woods from a “hunting party” the likes of which the film itself doesn’t even begin to so hint about. Perhaps that was the real point.