“Solomon’s House”: The Hermetic Foundations of Science/Scientism…

Most people today are familiar with the quote from Arthur C. Clarke, his third self-described “law” which says: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic”…

But what I find increasingly strange, is that while so many people seem to resonate with the truth of this addage, we do not at the same time seem to take it backwards to it’s inevitable conclusion, back to the implications this would seem to have about the origins of science and technology themselves.

Would most people react as favorably to a type of inverted version of this quote? Would they also agree with a preposition such as “Any primatively developed magic is indistinguishable from science…?”

Anyhow, I’m waffling a bit here, but the point is that the more we continue digging into the development of modern science or rather Scientism, with it’s rather glaringly false foundational philosophical assumptions such as Evolution & Copernicanism, and perhaps now Atomism as well, the more it really begs the broader historical question as to how in the heck we ever got to this point.

In the Western World, many of grew up in a culture and an educational system which for the most part, has regarded the development of scientific knowledge as largely the product of some vague concept of the Judeo/Christian belief system, this generic idea that it was the Christianized nations of Europe and their colonial offshoots which, because they had the Theistic foundation which taught that a rationale Creator made the world in an orderly way, that could be studied and understood, enjoyed the intellectual climate most preferable for scientific study and development, producing such great scientific minds such as Isaac Newton, Galileo, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Edison, Albert Einstien, etc. All those genius folks we learn about in school…

However this worldview does not hold up well at all to any decent scrutiny of the history of scientific thinking.

Not surprisingly it seems to be the Christian culture today that is the most blind in this matter, preferring to cling to this mythology about the Christian roots of Science, because it plays such a large role in the current approach to Christian apologetics, in familiar subjects such as Creationism, where so many sciences such as geology or astronomy are turned to in hopes of vindicating the Genesis account in favor of the Darwinian paradigm.

But when we listen to secular historians expound upon things that pertain to this development, the fuller picture is really not that difficult to begin to realize, especially if you’re willing to lay down a lot of those rosy-colored, Christian-slanted views of scientific history in Europe, America and the West…

In previous pieces I have delved a fair amount into the roles of both Alchemy and the Kabbala in the development of things like chemistry and atomic theory as well as the development of Copernican astronomy and cosmology, in tracing the Occult, Mystery School roots of what today we may refer to generically as the religion of Scientism, but there is another strand of Occultism which played a hugely signficant role in the progression of Scientism, and that strand was the introduction of Hermetic philosophy into Europe towards the beginning of what we now refer to as, the Renaissance…

The figure of Hermes himself, as well as the documents which bore his name, sheds an incredible amount of light as to how ancient esoteric teachings penetrated Europe and gave rise to the periods known as the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, and finally the Scientific and Industrial revolutions.

It is rather astounding to learn just how highly regarded the figure of Hermes Trismegistus to the European Renaissance mind was. He was considered by scholars from Augustine to Thomas Aquinas, to be not just a literal figure of history, but a pagan Egyptian priest, who, somehow, apparently because he was believed to be more or less a contemporary of Moses, was viewed as sort of this quasi-patriarchal figure. They really elevated him essentially to the same level as Moses or Abraham, but as this kind of extra-biblical prophet, who they argued gave credence to Christian doctrines such as the Trinity, though coming from a clearly non-Hebrew origin.

So, here we have the figure of Hermes, the quintessential magus, this pagan magician from antiquity, who somehow comes to receive this incredibly favorable treatment by European Christian theologians and scholars, alongside Europeans who are of course much more deeply attracted to the Occult elements of this tradition. And so in the 15th century, we have the Italian scholar, a Catholic Priest, Marsilio Ficino, who had been commisioned by the wealthy Medeci family to translate the works of Plato, and yet when the Medeci’s suddenly came into the possession of a greek manuscript said to be the writings of the magnificent Hermes, Ficino was ordered to halt all work on Plato and translate the Hermetic text with the utmost priority.

What resulted was the work known thereafter as the Corpus Hermeticum, and this volume, along with other works such as the Asclepius, began to be spread around Europe among scholars and Renaissance thinkers, being regarded as quite harmonious with the increasingly popular Kabbalistic writings, (and rightfully so, since they are derived from the same Occult origins) and all of which quite plainly was fairly inseperable from the spread of Copernicanism in Europe.

While the Corpus Hermeticum contained a fair amount of more philosophical/ideological content, it also contained descriptions of outright occult rituals, such as how to summon astral energies down from above into stone idols and animate them, and so is quite deserving of the categorization as witchcraft.

One prominant figure within the rise of Copernicanism whose Hermetic influences have been thoroughly documented is the well-traveled figure of Giordana Bruno, who first proposed that stars are distant suns, and was killed by being burned at the stake. Frances Yates, a 20th century historian who specialized in Renaissance history, wrote an entire book on this titled “GIordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition”, which you can now read online for free, see the link below.

Copernicas himself referred to Hermes in this quote abou the sun:

“In the middle of all sits the Sun enthroned. In this most beautiful temple could we place this luminary in any better position from which he can illuminate the whole at once? He is rightly called the Lamp, the Mind, the Ruler of the Universe; Hermes Trismegistus names him the Visible God, Sophocles’ Electra calls him the All-seeing. So the Sun sits as upon a royal throne ruling his children the planets which circle around him.”

Isaac Newton is well known to have been an alchemist and student of Kabbalah, supposedly having endeavored to translate the Emerald Tablets of alchemy, but he too was a student of the Corpus Hermeticum. So, we have Nicolaus Copernicus, Johannes Kepler, Robert Boyle, Isaac Newton, all heavily influenced by Hermeticism, and of course, Francis Bacon as well, whose writings would seem to eventually inspire the creation of the first official institution of scientific study, the Royal Society.

There has intrestingly enough been a fair amount of research done by numerous people examining the founding members of the Royal Society and their connections to both Freemasonry and Rocicrucianism. Francis Bacon, the famous occultist who is credited with basically being the father of the scientific method, wrote the well-known utopian novel “New Atlantis”, which described the creation of an ideal college, dedicated to human discovery and knowledge, called “Solomon’s House”…

The Royal Society was in many ways the blueprint for the Science departments for universities in the centuries that followed, and I believe, this is the phase in the historical progression where the Occult roots and influences were successfully white-washed from the enterprise of Science, as it morphed into the more contemporary concepts of Natural philosophy and scientific materialism we are familiar with today.

But, Yates argued, (rather convincingly in my opinion) that without the influx of Hermetic philosophy in the 15th to 17th centuries, there would quite simply have been no Scientific Revolution. Without the magical traditions of Hermeticism, which focuses on the influences of things on each other, on their interconnectedness in nature, and on the practices of observation of these influences, and the classification of phenomena and elements of nature, there’s no such thing as science as we know it today…

One thing that has really startled me, as a Christian myself, is to get to this point where I’ve had to actually stop, and recognize that if these influences of Alchemy, Kabbalism, Hermeticism, (and also Neo-Platonism) hadn’t entered in, then we’re left with a somewhat uncomforable question, as to whether or not the Bible on it’s own would have ever inspired people to the level of scientific study and technological advancement that so rapidly occurred, between the rediscovery of all these ancient Occult teachings (i.e. the “Renaissance” or revival of said Occultism) and the modern day.

Many people have equated Bacon’s “New Atlantis” to the founding of the United States of America, with it’s pervasive Freemasonic origins and all the esoteric symbolism of the streets of Washington DC, and so much more, and, I’d have to say that this theory probably has a lot of truth to it, but at the same time, is probably one a piece of the whole…

If the building of “Solomon’s House” was fundamental to the creation of that Luciferian utopia of the “New Atlantis”, then, I now have to think that in all probability, this massive thing that we call “Scientism” is really almost another term for that same over-arching thing. The re-introduction and re-establishment, of those ancient “sacred sciences”, or “seven liberal arts” of antiquity. In the days of the Early Christian church it was combatted as “Gnosticism”, the heresy of the Mystery School teachings which was constantly trying to embed itself within the orthodox Christian gospel, whereby the aquisition of knowledge, or “Gnosis” was central to humanity learning to save itself.

How is the current understanding of “Science” really any different?

(links/further resources):

Hermeticism: the nexus between science, philosophy and spirit

http://www.josephwaligore.com/rise-of-science/
http://www.academia.edu/26602034/Freemasonry_Rosicrucianism_and_the_Royal_Society
https://www.scribd.com/doc/23693925/THORNDIKE-LYNN-A-History-of-Magic-Experimental-Science-1923-888p-T1

Click to access Francis-a-Yates-Giordano-Bruno-and-the-Hermetic-Tradition.pdf

Randy Quaid, Illuminati Whistleblower..?

Most people have probably seen a news clip recently about Randy Quaid and his wife Evi being arrested over the weekend (as I did this morning). I suddenly found myself vaguely recalling seeing some random vid on YT some years ago, about how Quaid was in Canada somewhere, being filmed talking about the Illuminati in Hollywood or something to that effect.

I always loved Randy Quaid, especially in National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation as “cousin Eddie” (who didn’t though?) But somehow through the last five years of my “conspiratorial auto-didactation”, I somehow missed digging into this story being a passing glance. I was quite surprised to see the wife Evi has had a Youtube page, on which they’ve apparently been posting videos from what looks like public parks in Canada, up until the recent arrest in Vermont. Amazing.

What’s more amazing though, is how apparent it should be to anyone with much common sense at all that what Randy and Evi are going through absolutely IS a very malignant case of being persecuted by the “hidden hand of Hollywood”, because Randy had the courage to stand up and speak out regarding rampant corruption in the industry, or more accurately, just pure evil, as in things such as actors David Carradine and Heath Ledger being murdered, and not suicides…

When you stop and consider that the Quaid’s legal troubles all stem from the seemingly victimless “crime” of allegedly “squatting on a property they used to own”, which was somehow turned into a vandalism charge, it’s hard to not see it all as looking incredibly fishy indeed. I mean, come on now… We live in the day and age where celebrities get away with just about every conceivable crazy thing imaginable, where drug binges and DUI woes get swept aside with just a sprinkling of Hollywood-lawyer pixie dust. In the case of the Quaids, apparently their former lawyer/financial manager was really the start of much of the trouble, in that they claim he was siphoning off funds, setting up unauthorized trusts, etc., and basically draining them dry.

This is actually a pretty common thing in Hollywood, and the more I think about it, the more it makes me wonder if it might not actually represent a large part of how so many of Hollywood’s stars are effectively “handled”. I mean, if everyone knows that basically their entire fortunes, their mansions, their very careers and reputations, can all be ripped away and dragged through the mud at any time, then of course they’re going to “play ball”. Especially if it means ending up like like another “suicide”, a la Heath Ledger, David Carradine, Philip Seymour Hoffman, or Robin Williams.

My goodness, if such a thing is really true, and someone of such “Hollywood royalty” stock wasn’t immune to being made an example of? How sobering to think of what degree of control the Enemy would truly have over the minds of everyone working in Hollywood and the media. That is real fear friends.

But think about it.. Anytime the media jumps on board with demonizing/ridiculing someone in such a way, that is a big red flag. And all because they supposedly were “squatting” in a house they used to own? How many dollars in damage did they allegedly cause, in their “vandalism” anyhow, to the degree that it would validate years of court costs and police work and now possibly being extradited back to California..? Doesn’t that seem a little ridiculously excessive to anyone else, considering the nature of the original “crime”? (well, throw on top of that now the fact that they missed court dates, so of course they’re probably going to treat that as “contempt of court” and such…)

I know it’s easy to look at someone like Randy Quaid, especially now with his bushy beard and videos of him and his wife drinking wine in a public park, etc., and think that he must just be a washed up loser who broke the law and didn’t want to face up to his mistakes. I honestly doubt this narrative as much as I’ve ever doubted anything, and I think it quite possible that this “goofy actor” we’ve all loved might in fact be one of the few brave souls to have come out of the Hollywood machine in the past decades and actually spoken some diabolical Truth about the movie industry, even when he knew it would only make him appear crazier than any role he played on screen.

Hang in there Randy. Not everyone thinks the things you have been saying are crazy…

G is for Gravity? Ruminations on the “Generative Principle” in Evolution…

Virtually anyone who has spent any time at all looking into the secret societies behind the panorama of conspiratorial activity within this country and around the world, has undoubtedly become familiar with Freemasonry, and in turn, with the infamous “G” so often incorporated into the square and compass logo.

Cursory explanations delve into the notion of the Freemasonic “god”, or “Grand Architect”, (who they ultimately point to as being Lucifer, of course), while the G is also said to represent the so-called “Generative Principle”, as explained here:

“It conceives of the divine nature as residing in man, and that it is especially active and expressive in the sexual passion; and that the gratification of this passion is pleasing to the deity and is the duty of the Mason. It aims to make passion, therefore, sacred by making its gratification a moral and religious duty. On its theological side, Freemasonry is a sort of Pantheism, the deity being the generative principle, the reproductive power which pervades all animated nature. And as this power inheres in man, it is viewed as “incarnate in humanity in toto,” thus establishing man’s union and unity with the divine nature.” (excerpt from this exposition on the meanings of Masonry)

Now, so far all this is fairly old news. But what has been really persistent in my inquiries towards the possibility of true enclosed, Flat Earth, (and the subsequent realization that heliocentricism is itself a component of the broader Evolutionary lie) is that the more I think about it all, the more it very much seems to me that perhaps this whole “NASA paradigm”, if we can call it that, in many ways has served to essentially indoctrinate the masses not just with lies, but lies that are actually materialistic, “scientistic” versions of ancient Occultic, Luciferian doctrines.

And the subject of Freemasonry is itself a perfect example of helping us comprehend this, because we can look at the layers/levels/”degrees” of Masonry itself, and recognize how the lower, entry-level degrees are indeed quite oblivious to the hardened Satanic belief system propelling the entire thing. At the lower levels, they sincerely do just believe they are part of some kind of altruistic charitable Fraternity, and yet at the same time in those stages they are being presented with shallow, “hollowed out” explanations of the symbolism and rituals, which if they continue to “progress” in the Brotherhood they will become privy to the “deeper” meanings, etc.

Now, if we can fairly easily recognize Darwinian Evolution to be a repackaged Luciferian doctrine, masked in the guise of humanistic science, then when pondering the false cosmology of Copernicanism, I now have to say that the “theory of Gravity” does also seem to actually be another one of these ancient mystical concepts that has been repackaged and re-introduced to the masses as “scientific fact”.

After all, “Gravity” is not merely taught to be the pulling force produced by humongous collections of mass, such as stars/planets/moons etc., but it is also the very force which is alleged to have pulled all these celestial bodies together in the first place! According to the Big Bang, from the original “Singularity” sprang forth all the physical matter that is now still constantly being flung outward in every direction in an ever-expanding universe. But, that matter from the singularity then had to begin forming all the “elementary particles”, as described in such insanely convoluted manners as the following:

“In the most common models the universe was filled homogeneously and isotropically with a very high energy density and huge temperatures and pressures and was very rapidly expanding and cooling. Approximately 10−37 seconds into the expansion, a phase transition caused a cosmic inflation, during which the universe grew exponentially. After inflation stopped, the universe consisted of a quark–gluon plasma, as well as all other elementary particles. Temperatures were so high that the random motions of particles were at relativistic speeds, and particle–antiparticle pairs of all kinds were being continuously created and destroyed in collisions. At some point an unknown reaction called baryogenesis violated the conservation of baryon number, leading to a very small excess of quarks and leptons over antiquarks and antileptons—of the order of one part in 30 million. This resulted in the predominance of matter over antimatter in the present universe.”

Of course, this is pure nonsense, but throw in enough impressive-sounding words, and you can make it appear quite scientific indeed. First the “elementary particles” somehow are formed in all the heat, from an explosion which occurs for who-knows-what reason. Then those particles somehow form into atoms, then the atoms into the various periodic elements, and then the elements into molecules, and so on, and so forth…

Evolution is without question a mystical belief system at it’s core (which I have written about before), and so now in the context of Flat Earth research and the knowledge that NASA is basically a Freemasonic institution, it’s interesting, don’t you think, to ponder that ol’ “G” in the middle of the square/compass, in light of how Evolution and “Gravity” are more or less watered-down, “materialized” versions of what are really mystical, occult precepts.

This whole idea is one that I am actually exploring on a number of fronts here, as I do also suspect that the entire subject of the “planets” is again, another example of this same thing, but that will probably have to wait until another post. I do think I’m barely scratching the surface here, if indeed there is anything to these kinds of observations at all, and so I think it will be interesting to see what all might come out of it over time. If we have that much time left for such secondary speculations, I suppose…

Happy Merging-of-the-Two-Pillars Day…

Evolution needs Revolution: The Dual Gnostic Myths of Darwinism and Copernicanism…

The theme which unites ancient Sumeria to Darwinian scientific humanism, Big Bang assumptions, Luciferian Theosophy, liberal theology, occult New Age mysticism and all other anti-Christian but specifically anti-creation ex nihilo movements is the myth of evolution.

The myth of evolution stretches back to antiquity where it is closely connected to the idea that man is a being who though presently limited in time and space is nevertheless capable of achieving a great leap of being and evolving into a much more powerful god-like being in the future. Thus in the Epic of Gilgamesh, an epic poem from Babylonia (ancient Sumeria) Gilgamesh describes himself as two-parts god and one-part man as the result of the evolution of his being.

Long before Darwin, Greek nature philosophers (600–100BC) were teaching primitive evolutionary conceptions, abiogenesis, natural selection, transmigration, reincarnation and vast ages together with many other modern assumptions. The fragments of Anaximander (c. 610–546 BC) show that he taught that ‘humans originally resembled another type of animal, namely fish’ while Democritus (c.460–370BC) taught that primitive people began to speak with ‘confused’ and ‘unintelligible’ sounds but ‘gradually they articulated words.’

The Greek Atomist Epicurus (341–270BC), the father of contemporary materialism and many of its’ modern assumptions, taught that there was no need of a God or gods, for the Universe came about by a chance movement of atoms. (Evolution: An Ancient Pagan Idea, Paul James Griffith, creation.com)

Darwinism affirms the claim made by Epicurus that living beings created themselves, making Darwinism a modern Gnostic myth, said Dr. Wolfgang Smith, physicist and mathematics professor at Oregon State University:

“…As a scientific theory, Darwinism would have been jettisoned long ago. The point, however, is that the doctrine of evolution has swept the world, not on the strength of its scientific merits, but precisely in its capacity as a Gnostic myth. It affirms, in effect, that living things created themselves, which is in essence a metaphysical claim….Thus…evolutionism is a metaphysical doctrine decked out in scientific garb….it is a scientistic myth. And the myth is Gnostic, because it implicitly denies the transcendent origin of being; for indeed, only after the living creature has been speculatively reduced to an aggregate of particles does Darwinist transformism become conceivable. Darwinism, therefore, continues the ancient Gnostic practice of deprecating ‘God the Father Almighty, Creator of Heaven and earth.’ It perpetuates…the venerable Gnostic tradition of ‘Jehovah bashing.'” (From Old Gnosticism to New Age I, Alan Morrison, SCP Journal Vol. 28:4-29:1, 2005, pp. 30-31)

With respect to long ages, Plato and many other Greek philosophers taught that the present Universe came about millions of years ago. Writing in the fourth century AD, Lactantius said:

“Plato and many others of the philosophers, since they were ignorant of the origin of all things, and of that primal period at which the world was made, said that many thousands of ages had passed since this beautiful arrangement of the world was completed … .“ (ibid)

After the Greeks, the Roman naturalist Pliny the Elder (AD23–79) said we are so subject to chance,

“….that Chance herself takes the place of God; she proves that God is uncertain.” (ibid)

Greek and Roman philosophers received these ideas from ancient Sumerians (Babylonians), Egyptians and Hindus, whose nature philosophies extended back centuries before Greek and Roman civilization. For example, one Hindu belief was that Brahman (the Void or Universe) spontaneously generated itself (the modern theory of abiogenesis) as something like a seed or singularity about 4.3 billion years ago and then evolved under its’ own power by which it expanded and formed all that exists:

“These Hindus believed in an eternal Universe that had cycles of rebirth, destruction and dormancy, known as ‘kalpas’, rather like oscilla­ting big bang theories. We also read in the Hindu Bhagavad Gita that the god Krishna says, ‘I am the source from which all creatures evolve.” (ibid, Griffith)

In India the doctrine of evolution/reincarnation/karma was thoroughly established from ancient times. It was expounded first in the Upanishads (c. 1000 BC – AD 4), the philosophical-mystic texts held to be the essence of the Vedas.

The idea that the soul reincarnates is intricately linked to karma, the idea that jiva-atmas (souls) pass from one plane of existence to another and carry with them samskaras (impressions) from former states of being. These karmic impressions on the soul are taken to the next life and result in a causally-determined state of being. In some schools of Hinduism liberation from the cycle of death and rebirth (samsara), is considered the ultimate goal of earthly existence. This is known as Moksha in Hinduism or nirvana in Buddhism. Other traditions assert that liberation from samsara is merely the beginning of real spiritual life and beyond nirvana, activities continue, but are no longer of a worldly nature. Both sides agree on the phenomenon of evolution/reincarnation.

In its modern version Darwinian evolution describes the progress (or transmigration) of energy as it emerged out of spontaneously generated matter (chemicals) and its successive incarnations within the bodies of different kinds of nonlife-bearing and life-bearing beings over the course of millions and billions of years. Its counterpart, spiritual evolution, bespeaks the progress of spirit or divine spark as it reincarnates within the bodies of different beings over the course of millions and billions of years. In the words of Emergent Church leader Rob Bell, evolution is energy,

“…. a spark, an electricity that everything is plugged into. The Greeks called it zoe, the mystics call it ‘Spirit,’ and Obi-Wan called it ‘the Force’…..This energy, spark, and electricity that pulses through all of creation sustains it, fuels it, and keeps it growing. Growing, evolving, reproducing…” (Love Wins, pp. 144-145)

For Mystery Religion initiates and adepts evolution spiritually transforms man into superman:

“….the evolution of man into superman — was always the purpose of the ancient Mysteries, and the real purpose of modern Masonry is not the social and charitable purposes to which so much attention is paid, but the expediting of the spiritual evolution of those who aspire to perfect their own nature and transform it into a more god-like quality. And this is a definite science, a royal art, which it is possible for each of us to put into practice…” (The Meaning of Masonry, W.L. Wilmhurst, p. 47)

Evolution is an animated energy, serpent power or force which may or may not be divine depending on whether it is of the ‘secular’ Darwinian school of thought or of its’ spiritually pantheist counterpart. In either case, this energy usually emanates from an impersonal substance which from antiquity has been known variously as the Void, Chaos, Ground of Being, and Brahman for example. (all of the above borrowed from here.)

The Cult of Pythagoras…

Just as the Gnostic mythical concept of Evolution can be demonstrated to have originated LONG before Darwin, the mythological concept of helio-centric universe can also be shown to have arisen long before individuals such as Copernicus were credited with popularizing it.

The Gnostic origins of a non-stationary Earth take us back to the figures of Philolaus and Pythagoras. Most sources credit Philolaus as the one who came up with the model of the Earth, Sun, Moon all rotating around “central fire” in the universe, while others claim that Pythagoras held to this idea even before his student Philolaus. Either way, what is absolutely undeniable is the extremely Gnostic and esoteric footing on which both these men stood. To most of us average folks, Pythagoras is presented in school as the ancient Greek mathematician who gave us basic proofs such as the famous “Pythagorean theorem” regarding triangles (A squared plus B squared equals C squared).

To occult adepts however, Pythagoras is understood to be one of the most revered of ancient mystics and Mystery School teachers. Said to have been consecrated to the god Apollo even before his birth, Pythagoras was reared under the tutelage of teachers such as Thales and Anazimander at Miletus, but as a young man found himself unsatisfied by their seemingly disparate and contradictory forms of Gnosticism. He set out to find a more “synthesized” universal Truth, and allegedly traveled through most of the great civilizations at the time, visiting the priests of various Mystery Schools in places like Egypt, Babylon and Chaldea.

He basically combined all the Occult knowledge he could gather from the world at that time, and then eventually settled in Croton, Greece, where he started his own Mystery School, and developed a system of initiations and degrees, training through aestheticism, the majority of which was embedded within a complex code of numerical values and derivations. Thus, a vast amount of the concepts found in Occult Numerology and ‘Sacred Geometry’ which have filtered down through the centuries to our own time can be traced back to Pythagoras himself.

Freemason Albert Pike says in “Morals and Dogma”:

“Pythagoras refused the title of Sage, which means ‘One who knows’. He invented and applied to himself that of Philosopher, signifying one who is fond of or studies things secret or occult. The astronomy of which he was taught was astrology: his science of numbers was based on Kabalistic principles. Everything is veiled in numbers.“

And truly, the further one might look into the beliefs and pursuits of individuals such as Pythagoras and Philolaus, the more it becomes plain that these were not simply individuals preoccupied with a rational and scientific analysis of the natural world, as our secular education system to often portrays them. Indeed, Pythagoras is revered by Plato and all the famous Greek Philosophers who came after him, and in that light we can understand just how pervasively Gnostic all of Greek “Philosophy” truly is, how it was seeded and guided not simply by the imaginations and musings of speculative men, but by the doctrines of Demons as they were passed down through Mystery tradition and ancient secret societies.

Is it any wonder that occult brotherhoods such as the Freemasons have such a high regard for Pythagoras? Is it at all surprising to discover that his mathematical codes and numerological interpretations of the universe such as the “tetractys” are interwoven throughout Kabbalistic and Masonic symbolism?

And so from afar, when we step back and consider that neither Darwinian Evolution and Copernican Cosmology are not based on authentic scientific observation and experimentation, but rather on presupposed philosophical assumptions, it should also come as no real surprise that the ideological roots of both assumptions are practically the same. This only makes sense, really, because there is a rather obvious interdependence between the two. Darwinian Evolution really can’t even be conceived of outside of a massive, ever-expanding, self-creating Universe. A recognized geocentric cosmology would reveal the true absurdity of Evolution’s basic premises. At the same time, the limitless expanse of the Copernican Cosmos are offered as the last great challenge for humans to conquer in their Evolution as a species, and so, their is an undeniable symbiotic relationship between these two assumptive maxims which we are all inculcated with from the earliest age.

Both are designed to shape our perceptions of human origin, and human destiny alike. What is so interesting about looking at the example of Pythagoras, and the whole of ‘Greek Philosophy’ really, is that it could almost be said to be the first example of Esoteric/Occult knowledge being taken and formulated in such a way so that the “uninitiated” were still being given a version of the teaching on a level which was merely mechanical and non-spiritual. Greek Gnosticism is really where the ideological division between matter/spirit started, the false division between physical/ethereal, mechanical/mythical, scientific/religious… It’s actually a basic tenet OF Gnosticism, which pits the material against the spiritual, rejecting the Biblical concept of hell/hades and replacing it with the physical reality itself. So indeed, Gnosticism contains an Esoteric and exoteric exposition for everything, which has more or less been the template for all Occulted information ever since.

I believe this very much applies to our own time, where these Gnostic doctrines have been quite meticulously repackaged into forms which genuinely believe themselves to be wholly materialistic, empirical and scientific. So many adherents of Evolution today are staunchly materialistic in their worldview, completely oblivious to the fact that their beliefs stem from intensely religious and mythological beginnings. Currently we can see philosophies at the core of Evolutionary theory propelling the agendas of things like Transhumanism and the constant re-brandings of the New Age movement. The teachings of the Occult realm have always sought to pervert the Created order of the world, and obscure the true identity of it’s Creator. As Blavatsky said:

It is from this sobering perspective that I am unable to sympathize with the notion that the Flat Earth debate is a “distraction”, a complaint I have now heard countless times from various individuals who seem convinced that there is nothing of substance to the sudden ignition of this online discussion, and view it all as some intentional diversion from the Enemy himself. I concede that indeed it could be a distraction, in the sense that anything can be turned into a distraction, if it becomes the sole focus, eclipsing the Gospel of Salvation itself. However, I would say that it could only be reduced to the inevitably of a distraction, if such investigations were indeed shown to be utterly and entirely unsubstantiated. If the Flat Earth claims are instead shown to have real merit however, then it would make about as much sense to dismiss it from the Christian standpoint as it would to casually ignore the debate surrounding the theory of Evolution. If Evolution is not “scientific fact”, but only a horrific, Satanic lie, being propagated since ancient times, and now in every official institution of our modern world, then the subject itself is not a “distraction”, because it is a lie from the pit of hell, intended to lead men and women away from their Creator. The question of the Earth, and the Cosmology of the universe as a whole, is no different, because it cannot hardly be separated from the other question. It is all, quite plainly, surrounding the question of origins, and destiny…

Other resources:

http://patriotsandliberty.com/lindas-latest/2013/12/10/the-ancient-myth-of-evolution-sumeria-to-darwin-and-occult-new-age

http://www.newswithviews.com/guest_opinion/guest59.htm

http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kimball/100924

http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/school%20of%20pythagoras.htm

Columbia: Ancient Goddess and Principality of This Land…?

“Why is Washington named the ‘District of Columbia…?”

This is a great short video talking about the etymology of the name Columbia (something I’ve been curious about for a while), but also digging into the question of why D.C. is called a “district”, and ties that in with the OTHER two city/states, i.e. London and the Vatican. It also talks about the issue of the corporate constitution, put into effect in 1871, which effectively nullified the original Constitution, turned the United States into a subservient to the corporation in D.C., which apparently even has it’s own corporate officers (which was something I hadn’t heard before) This of course also touches upon the topic of “corporate personhood”, birth certificates, maritime law, central banking, and so much more.

Definitely one of the top NWO-insider interviews EVER…

I believe I posted something earlier about this, which was basically just a partial transcript of this interview, but yesterday I wound up actually listening to it, and all I can say is, wow. I don’t know if I’ve ever heard a single source cover so many “conspiratorial” topics, and from the perspective of personal connection mind you, not just from “researching” it. It just goes and goes, and really kind of served to “slap me awake” a little bit to be honest, in terms of reminding me just why things like Jade Helm and false flag terrorism and a “planned WWIII” etc., are really not some joke or paranoid delusion… This interview is actually from the late 90’s or early 2000’s I believe, but it seems to be getting a bit of a resurgence lately after being put back online via youtube recently. Crazy how much further things have progressed towards the bottom since even this was recorded…

I’m not sure I should even try to list the topics she mentions, but dang… It’s like a smorgasbord of “Praetorian” New World Order shenanigans: Inter-governmental intelligence operations, Operation Gladio-style assassins, illegal arms dealing, false flag terror, secret societies, Skull and Bones, Cap and Gown, O.S.S., mind-control, drug-running, the banking cartel, “Kabbalistic Zionists”, the mafia, Henry Kissinger, Linda Tripp, Lee Harvey Oswald, Benghazi, Bohemian Grove, homosexual orgies, blackmail, infiltration of the military, “Tailhook”, jag parties, gang stalking, Operation Paperclip, and on and on.

And I’m not even halfway through the almost seven hours of recorded material yet…

What I love about whistleblowers like these, is that if you saw this woman standing in line at the grocery store or something, you’d never think to yourself, “Hey, she’s probably some crazy conspiracy theorist!” She defies all the pathetic stereotypes, an intelligent, gentle, well-educated and well-travelled individual who loves her country and people in general. Almost every flag-waving, church-attending person I know would probably think she was just such a sweet soul who loves Jesus, yet they would have the hardest time accepting even a fraction of what she talks about as the truth.

War is a vehicle through which so much evil is able to be brought about. So much more so than simply the dead who fall on the battlefield. The Machine of War is vast and deceptive, and the governments and militaries of today, (which so many people still continue to put their hope in…), are in fact completely infiltrated and controlled by people who are in deep, deep bondage, to hollow existentialist philosophy, to sexual addiction and perversion, to fear, to the Fallen one, the god of this broken world. If we love the Truth and are true to Love, then there is no reason we should still be blindly rallying behind some flag, some political party, some nonsensical litany of “anti-terrorist” government propaganda, etc…

Okay. Sorry for the rant there. Just wanted to say that this interview is well worth listening to, so, check it out!

An Army of Lone Gunmen…

There’s an army of lone gunmen
tell me have you noticed this
which one by one keeps coming
like those foreign “terrorists”

For reasons know one ever knows
one at a time they snap
and without warning, in a crowd
they start to bust a cap

Racists? Muslims? Disaffected?
Some head-case off their meds?
Whatever background story’s told
the headlines count the dead

So while the country mourns once more
the State their hoped salvation
the next Lone Gunman waits for his
programming’s activation…

“Everybody’s in a dream, they’re in a reality coming from the military…”

Yes, I am still here, feeling as though the proverbial “rabbit hole” may indeed have a new bottom…

This guy has so many interesting things to say, such as the idea of the globe itself being a “created, religious icon”, and how everything from Evolution to Newtonian/Einsteinian physics to bogus moon landings, etc., being components of this grand conspiracy which has been centuries in the making.

Satan Vs. Lucifer: The Ultimate Hegelian Deception…

Seems like I keep sort of “tangentially” touching upon this topic in other posts, and I definitely keep encountering more and more examples of it all over the place, so I suppose it’s time to just write something about it more directly.

It’s certainly not a new concept, nor original to my own thinking, but one that I do believe has become increasingly apparent as time has progressed, and more and more “revelations” regarding the so-called “New World Order Elites” have surfaced and permeated the public consciousness. I would say that a broader awareness of the NWO has noticeably occurred over the last five years, since I first began to learn about it’s existence myself, and at this stage, it is increasingly difficult not to conclude that a sizeable amount of this disclosure is not in fact intentional, and part of the overall “plan”.

I must extend my gratitude to the author of the youtube channel Round Saturn’s Eye, a favorite of mine, because he really helped boil this whole issue down into a succinct and pointed way. He talks about this idea of “Satan vs. Lucifer” quite a lot, and how it really does permeate so much of the so-called “Truth Movement”, as well as so many other areas of pop culture and forms of societal programming etc. (In fact, I believe these sorts of statements probably have a lot to do with why R$E has been bearing the brunt of so many attacks recently, from people trying to “EXPOSE!” him… Tho I try not to get wrapped up in such YT soap operas, yeesh….)

The Satan vs. Lucifer meme is real, and it is huge. It’s a false paradigm, a true epitome of the Hegelian dialectic, and one that I honestly feel is going to increasingly become absolutely essential to understand for anyone who is at all seeking to be awake and aware of what is unfolding in these Times we are living in. It is a crucial component of the Great Deception, I believe. We could almost call it, the “spirit of anti-anti-Christ”…

What? An “A.A.C.”….? Well, yes. However, I am not necessarily saying that I think there will be an actual specific individual who will arise and serve as a type of “False anti-Christ” figure, (which most people in the world would view as some kind of tyrant, who was then overthrown in order to make way for the TRUE anti-Christ, which most of the world then embraces), ALTHOUGH, this could very well happen. I just think that either way, whether a specific individual/leader arises from the ranks of “Luciferian Elites”, or if simply that whole entire “cabal” of blatantly satanic overlords are exposed and overthrown, the same underlying principle is in effect, and more or less accomplishing the same desired result.

More and more we see the demonization of the “Elites” slipping into the mainstream. Is this because the “Truthers” are really gaining ground, or is it actually by design? More and more, the bankers and bureaucrats are demonized. Every time a new “leak” happens, like this new video alleging to show the staged ISIS beheading being staged, we seem to get a little closer to some kind “blow it all wide open” type of event. At least, I think examples such as that show how easily such a thing could possibly be accomplished.

And the fact that so many of the pieces of the overall ISIS propaganda production have been SO shoddy, and so careless in their execution, to me seems to fall right in line with this false good/bad agenda. More and more it is beginning to feel TOO easy. TOO obvious. They DO seem to be intentionally leading a bigger and bigger trail of breadcrumbs back to those old, corrupt “Elites”, and so, it is incumbent upon us to ask ourselves, why…..

The thing is, Hegel didn’t actually invent the dialectic approach so loved and routinely-applied by the occult power brokers, he simply was the first to articulate it in such an academic form as to have his name stamped upon it. The method itself goes back into the farthest reaches of history, back into the twisted mind of the fallen cherub himself. All the ancient gnostic and pagan mythologies are of course filled with variations of this same basic lie. Stories and legends, filled with false gods and goddesses, heroes and hybrids, demi-gods and monsters, some painted to look good, and appealing and on the side of humanity, others who are blatantly sinister and out for destruction. The realm of witchcraft, of “probing the ancient Mysteries”, is effectively defined by navigating a realm where ancient beings, ideas and energies are not regarded as perfectly good, or perfectly evil, but always swirling in a relativistic tempest of comparative vices and virtues. This of course is in complete contrast to the framework of the Bible, where the eternal God is perfect, and Holy, and outside of Creation, providing an ultimate and immovable standard for what is good, and what is evil, what is right and wrong, up and down. All Satan wants for the individual human soul, is to take themselves outside of that realm of God’s fixed standards, God’s provided absolutes, and step into the ethereal realm of man-centered, self-defined morality. This is the plane where humanity forever compares itself to the sins of others, and we are pitted against one another, judging the wickedness of those deemed more evil than us, as we defend the perceived righteousness and “divine potential” within ourselves.

And it is here that I must myself confess, that I too have been sucked into this very stream, particularly as I was learning about the New World Order, and things like the whole fraudulent Central Banking system, or ritualistic torture and mind control, eugenics, all the ways in which poisons are put into our food, water, air and “medicines”, and on and on… It’s enough to make you sick. And so, I too, have many times found myself ranting and raving against those “Elites”, as though these humans, from their rich, dynastic family lines and centuries-old occult traditions, were really somehow more fallen and wicked than myself, more worthy of my disdain, and really worthy of so much focus in terms of fighting against this entire oppressive
“system” of lies, death and deception which effectively defines our world today. I have been there myself, so I hope that no one feels like I am somehow trying to condemn anyone else for getting caught up in it all as well…

But I do believe that perhaps we are right now in a sort of “twilight” phase, a unique transitional moment which most likely will not linger for too much longer, when we have the luxury of being able to step back and examine things from a more macro perspective, and identify for ourselves the reality of how this “Luciferian agenda” very much DOES exist on many more sides, and in many more guises, that most people (whether part of the “Truth movement” or not) are willing to accept. If this scenario is at all found to be true, and the “Old system of the Elites” is allowed to be (intentionally…) torn down, in order to make way for the NEW system for an “enlightened, freed humanity”, then when that collapse really starts to happen in earnest, I do not believe that most people will be in the emotional or physical position to adequately weigh out such considerations.

Remember… The formula of the “Hegelian” dialectic works as follows: Thesis + antithesis = Synthesis. Introduce the problem, so you can then introduce your own intended “solution”. Order, out of chaos.

Many of us can readily observe such principles being used in things like the “War on Terror”, where fear is constantly fed, terror “threats” are constantly sirened (and manufactured), in order to constantly edge the populace, inch by inch, towards embracing an increasingly monstrous Super-State in the name of “security” and “safety”. More and more people are wakening up to the reality of this Super-State, and it’s existential threat to our individual liberties and basic human rights, and so…. What IF… What if another level, another “phase” of the dialectic in all of this, was to then, eventually, offer up a glowing, global, “solution” to THAT problem, whereby the “synthesis” is the provided “salvation” from the very maligned and hated Elitist overlords getting all the attention right now. “Love and Light”, as R$E puts it, in place of the obvious Dark and Dangerous.

Because truly, in the end, it’s all the SAME! The desired New World Order of the “Satanic Elite” is the SAME New Age utopia being preached by David Icke and David Wilcock and now Russel Brand, and all the other folks calling for some kind of global “consciousness shift”. It’s a false escape, a different side of the same coin. It’s just the preaching of Lucifer, “the light bearer”, in place of Satan, when in reality, they are both the same, Fallen, deceiving entity…

Only in Jesus, the TRUE messiah, is found the true and lasting way of Salvation. Only through His death and Resurrection, are we freed from the chains of our prison, do we “escape the matrix”, can we enter into Paradise. Only through Jesus, who loves us more than we can ever imagine. I encourage everyone, everyone who has ever given half a thought to any of the things I have written about here, to please, stop and give consideration to the things I been saying here. Look into it for yourself, through a different lens, a different angle, and see for yourself if these ideas don’t prove themselves to be quite true. Ask Him, to reveal Himself to you personally, to show if He is not indeed the very essence of Truth. I promise you will not regret it. Peace.